We are pleased to share with you The Global Employer – Global Immigration & Mobility Quarterly Update, a collection of immigration and mobility alerts from around the world.
Please click here to view.
Navigating the World – An Update on Key Global Employment Laws and Trends for US Multinational Employers 2022 Webinar Series: Americas
Special thanks to presenters Matias Herrero (Buenos Aires), Liliana Hernandez-Salgado (Mexico City), Maria Cecilia Reyes Jaimes (Bogota), Leticia Ribeiro (Trench Rossi Watanabe, Sao Paulo*) and Andrew Shaw (Toronto)
*Trench Rossi Watanabe and Baker McKenzie have executed a strategic cooperation agreement for consulting on foreign law
Our four-part Navigating the World webinar series features US moderators welcoming Baker McKenzie colleagues from around the globe as they share the latest labor and employment law updates and trends. In this session, US-based multinational employers with business operations in the Americas hear directly from Benjamin Ho and local practitioners on the major developments they need to know, and come away with practical tips and takeaways to implement.
Please click here to view a recording of the webinar highlighting the Americas.
We invite you to register to reserve your spot at our upcoming sessions:
MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA: Wednesday, June 15 at 9 am PT / 11 am CT/ 12 pm ET
ASIA PACIFIC: Wednesday, June 22 at 3 pm PT / 5 pm CT/ 6 pm ET
Click here to view the program details, to register and to watch recordings of any sessions you may have missed.
Measure What You Treasure – The Importance of Data in your I&D Strategy (Webinar)
Special thanks to panelist Nicholas Murray, of Twilio.
Join us for our webinar, “Measure What You Treasure,” co-hosted by the ACC Foundation.
The first step in any organization’s strategic approach to advancing inclusion, diversity and equity is ensuring that accurate data exists. But diversity data collection can be challenging. During this session our expert panelists will address the importance of data in your I&D strategy, how to get hold of it, what to do with it when you have it, and the related employment and data privacy law implications and considerations.
Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2022
Time: 1:00 – 2:00 pm ET
Click here to register.
Navigating the World – An Update on Key Global Employment Laws and Trends for US Multinational Employers 2022 Webinar Series: Europe
Special thanks to presenters Nadege Dallais (Paris), Fermin Guardiola (Madrid), Danielle Pinedo (Amsterdam), Stephen Ratcliffe (London) and Bernhard Trappehl (Munich).
Our four-part Navigating the World webinar series features US moderators welcoming Baker McKenzie colleagues from around the globe as they share the latest labor and employment law updates and trends. In this session, US-based multinational employers with business operations in Europe hear directly from Susan Eandi and local practitioners on the major developments they need to know, and come away with practical tips and takeaways to implement.
Please click here to view a recording of the webinar highlighting Europe.
We invite you to register to reserve your spot at our upcoming sessions:
THE AMERICAS: Wednesday, June 8 at 9 am PT / 11 am CT/ 12 pm ET
MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA: Wednesday, June 15 at 9 am PT / 11 am CT/ 12 pm ET
ASIA PACIFIC: Wednesday, June 22 at 3 pm PT / 5 pm CT/ 6 pm ET
Click here to view the program details and to register.
New York (Not Just NYC) Employers: Statewide Wage Transparency Law May Be Coming Your Way
Employers in New York State may soon be required to disclose a salary range in job postings to applicants and employees. New York’s S9427 was just sent to Governor Kathy Hochul’s desk, and if signed, employers in New York State will join employers in New York City (read more here), Colorado (read more here), and Washington State (read more here) in including wages in job advertisements. If signed by Governor Hochul, the law will be effective 270 days after signing.
If Governor Hochul signs S9427 in the current version of the law, employers advertising a job, promotion, or transfer opportunity that can or will be performed, at least in part, in the state of New York would be required to do the following:
- Disclose the compensation or “range of compensation” for the job, promotion or transfer opportunity. “Range of compensation” is defined as the minimum and maximum annual salary or hourly range of compensation for a job, promotion, or transfer opportunity that the employer in good faith believes to be accurate at the time of the posting of an advertisement for such opportunity. For commission-based jobs, promotions or transfer opportunities, employers meet the compensation disclosure requirement by including a “general statement” in writing that compensation is based on commission
- Include in the advertisement a job description for the position, if one exists.
Who would be covered?
The law would cover “employers,” defined as:
- (i) Any person, corporation, limited liability company, association, labor organization or entity employing four or more employees in any occupation, industry, trade, business or service, or any agent thereof; and
- (ii) Any person, corporation, limited liability company, association or entity acting as an employment agent or recruiter, or otherwise connecting applicants with employers.
However, temporary employment agencies are excluded from the current version of the law.
Recordkeeping
Employers would be required to keep and maintain necessary records to comply with the law’s requirements, including, but not limited to, the history of compensation ranges for each job, promotion or transfer opportunity and the job descriptions for those positions, if they exist.
Violations / penalties
If S9427 is signed into law, individuals claiming they have been harmed by a violation of the law would be able to file a complaint with the New York State Department of Labor Commissioner (the “Commissioner”). Employers violating the law would be subject to civil penalties in accordance with New York Labor Law § 218, and employers would be prohibited from refusing to interview, hire, promote, or employ-or otherwise retaliating against-applicants or current employees for exercising rights under the law.
Will there be clarification?
Under S9427, the Commissioner would be required to promulgate rules and regulations to effectuate the law indicating further clarification through rulemaking and regulations if the bill becomes law.
What’s next for salary disclosure laws?
Stay tuned for further developments on S9427. And watch our video chat The Proliferation Of Pay Transparency Laws: What US Employers Need To Know for a summary of current salary disclosure laws, the trends we’re seeing and pending legislation employers should keep an eye on, including California’s SB 1162. As always, contact your Baker McKenzie employment attorney for help with your employment needs.
Why Insurers May Worry About New York City’s New Salary Transparency Law
We are pleased to share a recent Life Annuity Specialist article, “Why Insurers May Worry About New York’s Salary Transparency Law,” with quotes from Robin Samuel. This article discusses the likely impact of New York City’s new salary transparency law on insurers, other employers and job postings in New York City.
Click here to continue reading this article.
Original article published in Life Annuity Specialist.
Running a Privacy Law-Compliant Inclusion & Diversity Data Collection Program Globally
Many thanks to our data privacy colleague, Helena Engfeldt, for co-authoring this article.
Many organizations are proactively advancing diversity and inclusion goals globally to include a focus on recruitment and employee-directed initiatives. These efforts are consistent with organizational values and business goals, even in cases where diversity data collection may have the potential to increase (rather than decrease) risks of discrimination claims. Beyond addressing D&I to comply with anti-discrimination laws, most organizations also consider it an urgent business need for commercial success. In moving from actions to outcomes, organizations are seeking to identify and utilize metrics to measure progress, impact and accountability to include the collection of diversity-related data. Privacy and employment law professionals are increasingly being asked to expand such programs globally.
Click here to continue reading this Article.
Original article published in IAPP.
Trade Secrets Shorts: A Global Video Series
Across the world, trade secrets are becoming increasingly important. As companies align workforce transformation, manage supply chain operations and balance the needs of their digital transformation journey, new strategies are required for the identification, protection and enforcement of their most valuable, complex and market-differentiating trade secrets.
In this series of bite-sized videos, hear from Baker McKenzie’s global trade secrets team across disputes, intellectual property, data & technology and employment & compensation on best practices for a strategic, multidisciplinary approach to manage your trade secrets, disputes and risks.
How Baker McKenzie Manages Trade Secrets Globally
Brad Newman (Partner, Palo Alto), Christine Streatfeild (Partner, Washington, DC), Celeste Ang (Partner, Singapore) and Jason Raeburn (Partner, London) talk about our Global Trade Secrets Group and uncover regional trends through this video.
Click here to watch the video.
Remote Working:
The New Normal and the Impact on Your Trade Secrets
Today’s remote working environment can lead to unexpected complications when employers seek to prevent the disclosure of trade secrets or enforce restrictive covenants. Stephen Ratcliffe (Partner, London) outlines some of the key trade secrets issues that arise in remote working scenarios and provides practical tips for avoiding common pitfalls.
Click here to watch the video.
Mexico’s New Trade Secrets Laws
In this episode, Marina Hurtado-Cruz (Partner, Mexico City) explores key changes to Mexico’s new trade secrets law under new legislation, including an expanded scope of protection for eligible subject matter and enhanced enforcement mechanisms.
Click here to watch the video.
The Supreme Court of California Has Ruled: Break Premiums Are Wages That Must Be Listed on Employee Paystubs and Paid Immediately on Termination of Employment
The Supreme Court of California has just resolved a long-standing debate over whether employees may recover additional statutory penalties if employers do not include unpaid premium payments for meal period and rest break violations (commonly referred to as “break penalties”) on employee paystubs, or include such premium payments with an employee’s final wages due immediately on termination of employment. Finding that break premium payments are “wages,” and not penalties, the Supreme Court has ruled that employees may recover additional Labor Code penalties for the late payment of final wages or paystub violations if break premiums are not included on paystubs or in an employee’s final wages. These “penalties on penalties” can make noncompliance extremely costly for employers.
In Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, a putative class of security guards alleged meal break violations for on-duty, compensated meal periods under California Labor Code section 226.7, seeking to recover premium payments for allegedly deficient meal breaks, penalties for the late payment of the allegedly owed premium payments on termination of employment (pursuant to Labor Code Section 203), penalties for allegedly inaccurate wage statements that omitted the premium payments allegedly owed (pursuant to Labor Code section 226), and attorney’s fees.
The Court of Appeal held that unpaid premium wages for meal break violations do not entitle employees to additional waiting time penalties or penalties for inaccurate pay stubs (i.e., penalties on penalties) if their pay and pay statements during the course of the violations included the wages earned for on-duty meal breaks, but not the unpaid premium wages.
The issues on appeal to the Supreme Court of California:
- Does a violation of Labor Code section 226.7–requiring payment of premium wages for rest and meal period violations–give rise to waiting time or inaccurate pay stub penalties when the employer does not include the premium wages in the employee’s wage statements but does include the wages earned for meal breaks themselves? The Court of Appeal answered this question “no,” but the California Supreme Court reversed and held that employees may recover Section 226.7 penalties if premium wage payments are not listed on paystubs.
- Must premium payments for missed breaks be paid within the time limits for final wages proscribed by Labor Code section 203? The Supreme Court answered “yes,” opening the door for penalty claims on the late payment of premium payments on termination.
- What is the applicable prejudgment interest rate for unpaid premium wages owed under Labor Code section 226.7? The Court of Appeal said seven percent, and the California Supreme Court agreed.
What does this mean for employers?
Employers should immediately:
- Check that premium payments for missed breaks are being included on employee paystubs for the pay periods in which the premiums are owed;
- Ensure the final wages for any terminating employee includes any premium payments “earned” by the employee before the termination date; and
- Ensure that premium payments are being calculated and paid at the employee’s “regular rate of pay,” instead of their base hourly rate. (See our prior blog, here).
With the Supreme Court’s ruling in Naranjo, meal and rest break premiums are now “wages,” and an employer’s failure to pay premiums can bring about costly wage statement and waiting time penalty claims. Employers who have been diligent about paying meal and rest break premiums now must also be even more careful to avoid having to pay additional penalties to employees.
The Proliferation of Pay Transparency Laws: What US Employers Need to Know (Video)
Pay transparency laws (laws requiring employers to disclose compensation ranges to applicants) are spreading like wildfire across the US. Regulators are hoping such laws eliminate pay differentials based on gender or race. Putting good intentions aside, the laws are a source of huge consternation for businesses as the state and local requirements vary greatly in terms of what must be disclosed to whom and at what point in the hiring process.
In this Quick Chat video, our Labor & Employment lawyers discuss key developments in New York City, California, Colorado, Washington and several other jurisdictions. Liz, Paul and Di are all in the weeds helping multistate and multinational businesses develop consistent and compliant compensation plans and recruitment policies, and they share their advice here.
Click here to watch the video.