Compensation

Subscribe to Compensation via RSS

While we do not often report on proposed legislation, two provisions in the bill the House Ways and Means voted out of Committee on May 14th (and which was voted out of the House Budget Committee on May 18th) are worthy of attention, as they reflect how two of President Trump’s campaign promises are beginning to take shape. Sections 110101 and 110102 of the Ways and Means Committee’s “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” would give certain workers an above-the-line deduction for “qualified tips” and “qualified overtime compensation” for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, and ending for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2028. Assuming the effectives dates relate to the service provider’s returns, and most service providers have a calendar year return and are on the cash method of accounting, the deduction would apply to tips and overtime paid in 2025 through 2028. This means the deductions are proposed to be retroactive and proposed to apply to amounts paid even before enactment of the bill.

As an above-the-line deduction, service providers will be able to directly reduce their gross income, whether they itemize or take the standard deduction, by the amount of the qualified tips or overtime. Making this deduction available to the worker creates reporting and withholding obligations for the service recipient, as discussed in more detail below. 

In order to be deductible as qualified overtime compensation, the payment must be overtime paid as required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act that is in excess of the regular rate (as used in that section) at which such individual is employed. Qualified overtime compensation does not include any amount treated as a qualified tip.

In order to be deductible, qualified tips generally must be paid voluntarily to a person who works in an occupation which traditionally and customarily received tips on or before December 31, 2024. The Secretary of the Treasury is directed to provide a list of occupations that traditionally and customarily received tips in 2024 and before. As proposed, the deduction for qualified tips applies for both employees receiving a Form W-2, and independent contractors receiving a Form 1099-K or Form 1099-NEC, and includes amounts reported by the business on Form 4137. Those whose personal business provides services in accounting, health, law, actuarial science, athletics, brokerage services, consulting, financial services, or the performing arts would not be allowed to claim the tip deduction. In the case of tips received in the course of a trade or business, the deduction is proposed to be limited to gross receipts from the business less costs of goods sold and expenses allocable to such receipts. The Secretary of the Treasury is directed to prescribe regulations to prevent abuse of the deduction and reclassification of income as tips.Continue Reading No Tax on Tips and Overtime Campaign Promises Take Shape in “One, Big, Beautiful Bill”

As we enter 2025, it is crucial for employers to review the numerous changes in labor laws across Latin America from 2024 and to anticipate the trends that will shape the coming year. In this blog, we provide a comprehensive overview of the key updates, reforms, and new regulations that have impacted the labor landscape in various LATAM countries in 2024, and what to expect in 2025.

2024 Recap

Argentina

  • No more labor fines: Argentina removed fines for issues like defective registration and delayed severance payments.
  • Easy employee registration: Electronic pay slips and digital proof of payments are now accepted.
  • Subcontracting simplified: The use of third-party employees to perform company tasks is no longer considered an illegal substitution of the employer.
  • Digital work certificates: Work certificates now have simplified delivery through digital means.
  • Extended trial period: The probationary period for new employees has been extended from 3 to 6 months (and up to 12 months in some cases).
  • Pregnancy protection: Pregnant employees can work up to 10 days before giving birth.
  • Labor amnesty: A labor amnesty was introduced covering unregistered or poorly registered employment relationships.

Continue Reading Latin America Employment & Compensation: 2024 Recap and 2025 Trends

Here’s your go-to guide for annual filing and reporting requirements for global employee share plans.

It is almost the end of the calendar year and time for multinational companies to consider the necessary tax and regulatory filings for global share plans triggered by the close of 2024 (or by the end of a local…

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive represents one of the biggest ever shifts in reporting requirements for organizations. (For most companies, the first reporting will be on the financial year which starts after January 1, 2025.)

It requires most large organizations to comply with mandatory, detailed sustainability reporting standards, including extensive employment related disclosures. We are already advising a number of organizations in their sustainability journey and employment-related implications of the CSRD and, if it is not something you are already looking it, it will likely be on your radar very soon.

tl;dr

The employment-related implications of the CSRD mean that organizations will have to provide detailed descriptions of workforce policies; provide information on how the company engages with workers and workers representatives; and provide specific metric and target data relating to diversity, wages, compensation, health and safety and incidents and complaints (e.g., harassment and discrimination complaints), amongst others. There are also further disclosures required relating to workers in the supply chain. What is clear is that reporting will cover some potentially very sensitive topics, requiring sufficient preparation and careful consideration.Continue Reading The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive | Employment Law Implications

  • An overview of key global immigration and mobility issues to consider related to immigration, employment, compensation and employee benefits, income taxes and social insurance, and global
…

The FTC rule banning post-employment noncompetes was published in the Federal Register on May 7, which means the rule will take effect on September 4, 2024, unless pending lawsuits to void the rule are successful.

Despite considerable uncertainty around when, or even whether, the rule will apply, employers should prepare now so as not to be caught flatfooted. The first step is to understand the rule’s parameters and potential impact on your business. Our FAQs guide you through the intricacies of the rule and the steps you should take while waiting for the lawsuits challenging the rule to be resolved.

Application of the Rule to Workers

1. Does the rule apply to B2B noncompetes?

No, the FTC rule does not apply to business-to-business (B2B) noncompetes. Instead, existing federal antitrust laws should continue to be considered when evaluating B2B noncompetes.

2. Does the rule apply to all workers?

No, there are limited exceptions. First, the rule does not invalidate existing noncompete agreements (i.e. agreements entered into on or before the effective date of September 4, 2024) with “senior executives.” After that date, new noncompetes with all US employees will be prohibited.

“Senior executive” means a worker who received “total annual compensation” of at least $151,164 in the preceding year (or the equivalent amount when annualized if the worker was employed during only part of the year) and who is in a “policy-making position.”

  • “Total annual compensation” may include salary, commissions, nondiscretionary bonuses, and other nondiscretionary compensation earned during the preceding year, but does not include the cost of, or contributions to, fringe benefit programs.
  • Those in a “policy-making position” may include the President, CEO or equivalent, or others with “policy-making authority,” meaning “final authority to make policy decisions that control significant aspects of a business entity or common enterprise.” In the Supplementary Information to the rule (the FTC’s commentary on the rule), the Commission notes “many executives in what is often called the ‘C-suite’ will likely be senior executives if they are making decisions that have a significant impact on the business, such as important policies that affect most or all of the business. Partners in a business, such as physician partners of an independent physician practice, would also generally qualify as senior executives under the duties prong, assuming the partners have authority to make policy decisions about the business.”

Second, the rule does not apply to workers outside of the United States. See FAQ 11 below.Continue Reading Thirteen Things You Didn’t Know About the FTC’s Noncompete Ban and Five Steps to Prepare Now in Case it Takes Effect

Millions of additional employees will soon be eligible for federal overtime because of the Department of Labor’s April 23 Final Rule. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), certain salaried employees are exempt from federal minimum wage and overtime requirements if they are employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional (EAP) capacity. This is sometimes called the “white collar” exemption. The Final Rule:

  • Increases the minimum salary requirement for the EAP exemption from $684 per week ($35,568 annualized) to $844 per week ($43,888 annualized) effective July 1, 2024 and to $1,128 per week ($58,656 annualized) effective January 1, 2025; and
  • Increases the minimum total annual compensation level for exemption as a “highly compensated employee”—e.g., one who customarily and regularly performs any one or more of the exempt duties or responsibilities of an executive, administrative or professional employee—from $107,432 to $132,964 effective July 1, 2024 and to $151,164 effective January 1, 2025.

Continue Reading DOL Raises the Federal Overtime Salary Threshold | Next Steps for US Employers

In many cases, when a candidate is recruited, they offered a new hire grant of equity awards and (possibly) subsequent “refresh” grants. Depending on the company, this can be a significant component of the employee’s total compensation and may be the most important piece to get the candidate to accept the offer. 

So, naturally, companies tend to include information about the equity awards in the offer letter provided to the candidate, together with information about the employment terms (e.g., base pay, bonus eligibility, etc.). 

If the candidate is to be employed by an entity outside the United States that is different/separate from the company that will be granting the equity awards (typically the parent company), we strongly recommend changing this practice. In a nutshell, we would advise to delete any references to the equity awards from the offer letter (as well as from any employment agreement that may be provided later or at the same time) and to communicate information regarding the equity awards in a separate equity award side letter that is provided by the granting company. Continue Reading The Case for Not Mentioning Equity Awards in Offer Letters

New York may soon restrict employers and employment agencies from using fully-automated decision making tools to screen job candidates or make other employment decisions that impact the compensation, benefits, work schedule, performance evaluations, or other terms of employment of employees or independent contractors. Draft Senate Bill 7623, introduced August 4, aims to limit the use of such tools and requires human oversight of certain final decisions regarding hiring, promotion, termination, disciplinary, or compensation decisions. Senate Bill 7623 also significantly regulates the use of certain workplace monitoring technologies, going beyond the notice requirements for workplace monitoring operative in New York since May 2022 and introducing data minimization and proportionality requirements that are becoming increasingly common in US state privacy laws.

While there is not yet a federal law focused on AI (the Biden administration and federal agencies have issued guidance documents on AI use and are actively studying the issue), a number of cities and states have introduced bills or resolutions relating to AI in the workplace. These state and local efforts are all at different stages of the legislative process, with some paving the path for others. For example, New York City’s Local Law 144 took effect on July 5, prohibiting employers and employment agencies from using certain automated employment decision tools unless the tools have undergone a bias audit within one year of the use of the tools, information about the bias audit is publicly available, and certain notices have been provided to employees or job candidates (read more here).

If enacted, Senate Bill 7623 would take things much further. Here are some of the most significant implications of the draft legislation:Continue Reading Check Yourself Before You Wreck Yourself: New York and Other States Have Big Plans For Employer Use of AI and Other Workplace Monitoring Tools