Listen to this post

In April, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a statewide right-to-recall law — S.B. 93 — affecting certain employers. One of the key provisions of the new law, which has not been subject to much discussion, is how it affects corporate transactions.

In this article, we discuss how this new statute that could present challenges for deals, as well as a few older laws that never fail to complicate things when doing deals in the Golden State.

Click here to continue reading this Article.

This article was originally published in Law360.

Listen to this post

As we previously reported here, the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board voted last week to amend Cal/OSHA’s COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS) so that new mask and physical distance rules will apply in California workplaces effective June 15, 2021.  Now, less than four days later, the Standards Board has called a special board meeting for June 9 to consider “new information from the California Department of Public Health on pending guidance regarding COVID-19 Prevention, and take action if appropriate.” The Standards Board will hold this special meeting in advance of its regularly-scheduled Standards Board meeting on June 17.  Employers should watch this new twist in the Cal/OSHA ETS saga closely.

Continue Reading NSFW: There Is Yet Another Twist in the Continuing Saga of Cal/OSHA’s Mask and Distance Mandates for California Workplaces

Listen to this post

Special thanks to presenters Mirjam de Blecourt (Amsterdam), Nadege Dallais (Paris), Fermin Guardiola (Madrid), Stephen Ratcliffe (London) and Bernhard Trappehl (Munich).

Our four-part Global Guided Tour for US Multinational Employers webinar series is your passport to ensure that your organization is up to speed on the key labor and employment issues affecting business operations in Europe, the AmericasAsia Pacific, and the Middle East and Africa.

During the European stop on our tour, moderated by Susan Eandi, Baker McKenzie’s in-market presenters discussed the most recent developments and challenges impacting employers and shared legal updates, practical tips and takeaways for companies to action now.

Please click here to view a recording of the webinar highlighting Europe.

Join us at the upcoming sessions applicable to your organization:

THE AMERICAS, Wednesday, June 9, 9am PT / 12pm ET

ASIA PACIFIC, Wednesday, June 16, 3pm PT / 6pm ET

MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA, Wednesday, June 23, 9am PT / 12pm ET

Click here to view the program details and to register.

Listen to this post

Mark Twain never actually said “The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.”  But had he sat in on yesterday’s (June 3, 2021) Cal/OSHA Standards Board meeting, he might have said something similar about the proposed amendments to Cal/OSHA’s COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (“ETS”).

And no one would blame him because, less than an hour after voting to reject the proposed amendments to the ETS, Cal/OSHA’s Standards Board completely changed course by voting unanimously to approve the amendments. The amended ETS, which will apply to most California employers and workplaces, is expected to take effect June 15.

What does this mean for California employers?

In summary, the amendments will require employees who work indoors to continue wearing face coverings indefinitely, except in certain limited circumstances, but also will allow employers to relax physical distancing requirements after confirming which employees are fully vaccinated and providing unvaccinated employees with respirators for their voluntary use.

Continue Reading Cal/OSHA Board Votes to Approve Amendments to COVID-19 ETS Almost Immediately After Voting To Reject Them

Listen to this post

Apparently Cal/OSHA is not yet ready for California workplaces to do away with masks and social distancing, despite the recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) and California state guidance allowing fully vaccinated persons to forgo masks and distancing indoors. On May 28, 2021, Cal/OSHA’s Standards Board – a seven member body appointed by the Governor that is responsible for adopting “reasonable and enforceable standards” for the agency – published proposed amendments to the Cal/OSHA COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS) currently applicable to most worksites. Though many thought Cal/OSHA would fall in line with the California state guidance saying that vaccinated employees do not need not to wear masks or physically separate indoors as of June 15 (and leaving it up to employers to figure out how to determine who is vaccinated and who is not), Cal/OSHA appears to be leaning in a different direction.

Face coverings required indefinitely for indoor worksites

If the Standards Board approves the proposed amendments to the ETS at its upcoming June 3 meeting, Cal/OSHA will continue to require face coverings for all indoor worksites, with no end date specified. Employers will have to provide and “ensure” employees wear face coverings indoors, unless all persons “in a room” are fully vaccinated and do not have COVID-19 symptoms. In that case, the employees in that room don’t have to wear face coverings.

Otherwise, with only relatively minor exceptions for employees who cannot wear face coverings due to medical or mental health conditions or disabilities, or for tasks that cannot be performed while wearing a face covering, face coverings will be required indoors without regard to vaccination status.

For outdoor worksites, employees must wear face coverings if they are within six feet of other persons unless they are fully vaccinated and do not have COVID-19 symptoms (of course, under the ETS, employers should keep any employees who have COVID-19 symptoms away from the work place in any event).

Continue Reading Cal/OSHA Signals That It Intends to Require Masks and Physical Distancing Throughout the Summer — In Stark Contrast to California’s Targeted Reopening Date of June 15

Listen to this post

Employers have been awaiting guidance from the EEOC on vaccine-related incentives since the EEOC stated in April 2021 that it would issue new guidance (but declined to state when). Now, they have it. On May 28, 2021, the EEOC issued updated and expanded COVID-19 guidance in its technical assistance document “What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws.” The updated guidance provides clarification and supplements the original December 2020 version of Section K (“Vaccines”) of the technical assistance.

Key updates regarding incentives include:

  • From a federal EEO standpoint, employers administering vaccines to their employees can offer incentives for their employees to be vaccinated, as long as the incentives are not coercive-but a large incentive could make employees feel pressured to disclose protected medical information by way of pre-vaccination disability-related screening questions.
  • Federal EEO laws do not prevent or limit employers from offering incentives to employees to voluntarily provide documentation or other confirmation of vaccination obtained from a third party (not the employer) in the community, such as a pharmacy, personal health care provider, or public clinic. Employers must keep vaccination information confidential pursuant to the ADA.

Notably, the EEOC stated in this update that it is beyond the EEOC’s jurisdiction to discuss the legal implications of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) status of the three COVID-19 vaccinations or the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approach to vaccine authorization–a response to “many inquiries” the EEOC received about the type of authorization granted the vaccines by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA.

Continue Reading EEOC Updates its COVID-19 Technical Assistance: Employers Administering Vaccines Can Offer Non-Coercive Incentives to Employees

Listen to this post

California employers who have been eagerly awaiting amendments to the Cal/OSHA COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS) could be in luck. The Cal/OSHA Standards Board is scheduled to meet June 3, 2021 to consider and vote on proposed amendments to the ETS (see June 3, 2021 Board Meeting Agenda, here).

The Standards Board was originally scheduled to vote on proposed amendments at a May 20, 2021 meeting, but that vote was deferred to June 3 to allow Cal/OSHA to consider the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) May 13 update to its Interim Public Health Recommendations for Fully Vaccinated People and to present a new proposal to the Standards Board. The updated CDC guidance provides that individuals who are fully vaccinated can largely go without masks or physical distancing in most indoor and outdoor settings, with certain exceptions, including a deferral to applicable law and local business and employer workplace practices and rules (as explained in our prior blog here). In light of the CDC update, California Health & Human Services Agency Secretary Dr. Mark Ghaly announced on May 17 that “California plans to implement the CDC’s guidelines around masking to allow fully vaccinated Californians to go without a mask in most indoor settings” starting June 15, 2021. Cal/OSHA vowed to limit any potential changes to the proposed amendment to consideration of the updated CDC guidance in order to meet the targeted June 15 effective date for the ETS amendments.

The proposed amendments originally set to be considered and voted on at the May 21 meeting incorporated several key changes (which now may be modified given the CDC’s May 13 guidance), including:

  • Fully vaccinated employees would no longer be required to wear masks or physically distance, as long as all individuals in the location are all fully vaccinated and asymptomatic.
  • Fully vaccinated employees, or asymptomatic employees who have fully recovered from COVID-19 in the last 90 days, would no longer need to be offered COVID-19 testing or excluded from the workplace after a close contact exposure with COVID-19.
  • Employees who wear respirators would be exempt from the ETS physical distancing requirement (but the use of such respirators must be administered in compliance with Cal/OSHA’s respiratory protection standard).
  • Instead of addressing a COVID-19 exposure based on an “Exposed Workplace,” employers would address it based on an “Exposed Group”-a definition that takes into account different shifts of employees, the wearing of face coverings, and the amount of time a COVID-19 case spends in a given area to narrow the employer’s obligations (in terms of investigating, contact tracing, notification, required reporting, etc.) under the ETS for a COVID-19 case.

The Standards Board anticipates posting the text of the new proposed amendments (as well as a meeting notice and Finding of Emergency) on May 28 on the Cal/OSHA website-and those who want immediate notification when the new proposed text has been posted can add their names to a mailing list.

Stay tuned for additional updates regarding the Cal/OSHA ETS amendments, and for your other employment related needs, contact your Baker McKenzie employment attorney.

Listen to this post

As vaccination rates increase, officials across the country are reconsidering their health and safety protocols and workplace reopening guidance. Here are a few of the most recent changes that employers need to know.

On-site Employee Health Screening No Longer Required in San Francisco but Masks and Distancing Remain

On May 20, 2021, San Francisco’s Department of Public Health updated the city’s Health Order to loosen COVID-19 restrictions. Under the new rules, businesses are no longer required to perform health screenings for all personnel and patrons, unless required by the state. Public health officials credited the ongoing vaccination effort in bringing COVID-19 cases to the lowest levels seen during the pandemic. As of May 19, 76% of eligible San Francisco residents have been vaccinated, one of the highest vaccination rates in the country.

Continue Reading The Shifting Sands of COVID-19 Regulations: New Rules Regarding Health Screening, Vaccine Cards and Vaccine Passports

Listen to this post

Special thanks to guest contributor, Christopher Guldberg

The Internal Revenue Service has issued welcome guidance related to the COBRA subsidy provisions under the American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”) in the form of IRS Notice 2021-31 (the “Notice”).

As background, for the period from April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021, ARPA requires employers to provide a 100% COBRA premium subsidy (the “COBRA Subsidy”) for “assistance eligible individuals” (an “Eligible Individual”).  In general, an Eligible Individual is anyone who elects COBRA continuation coverage due to a loss of coverage as a result of any reduction in hours or an involuntary termination of employment.  The employer recoups the cost of the COBRA Subsidy through a dollar-for-dollar tax credit that applies to reduce the employer’s share of the hospital insurance premium component of FICA taxes paid on employee wages.

In many cases, the Notice mirrors the guidance issued under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”). Below is a summary of some of the key guidance points included in the Notice.

Involuntary Termination

Similar to the definition used under ARRA, an involuntary termination of employment means “a severance from employment due to the independent exercise of the unilateral authority of the employer to terminate employment, other than due to the employee’s implicit or explicit request, where the employee was willing and able to continue performing services.” A determination of whether a termination of employment is “involuntary” is a facts and circumstances determination.

The Notice clarifies that resignations based on good reason or constructive termination may be considered involuntary terminations for purposes of the COBRA subsidy depending on the facts.  Similarly, involuntary terminations include employee participation in a voluntary “window” severance program where employees who do not elect to participate are facing impending termination. Not all window severance programs carry impending terminations for employees who do not elect to participant and even where impending terminations may be part of the window program that is not always communicated to employees.  Thus, it is unclear whether the COBRA Subsidy would apply in those situations.

Coordination with Voluntary COBRA Subsidies Provided by Employers

If an employer does not otherwise voluntarily subsidize COBRA premium costs, the tax credit that the employer can claim is the premium amount not paid by the Eligible Individual (which can include the traditional additional 2% administrative charge permissible under COBRA).  Any amount voluntarily subsidized by the employer is not eligible for the tax credit. For example, if a severance plan provides that the employer will pay 100% of the COBRA premium for two months following termination, the employer could not take a tax credit for the voluntary subsidy provided during those two months.  Similarly, if the plan only provided for a partial voluntary subsidy (e.g., the employer portion of active premiums), the tax credit can be claimed only for the reduced premium that would have been paid by the employee for those two months (that is, in this case, the employee portion of the premium).  Thus, employers may want to revisit severance plans that provide for voluntary subsidized coverage during the ARPA COBRA Subsidy window.

Self-certification or Attestation

Individuals who have access to other group health coverage or Medicare are not eligible to receive the COBRA Subsidy.  The Notice clarifies that an employer may, but is not required to, have individuals self-certify that they are eligible for the COBRA Subsidy and that they are not eligible for other group health plan coverage or Medicare and the employer may rely on that self-certification absent actual knowledge to the contrary. The Notice also notes that claiming the tax credit will require documented substantiation.  An employer is allowed to rely on other evidence to substantiate eligibility (for example employment records), but collecting attestations and/or self-certifications of eligibility would be advisable.

Interaction with Extended Election Deadlines

Disaster Relief Notice 2021-01 suspended the timeframe to make a COBRA election until the earlier of one year or until 60 days after the conclusion of the COVID-19 National Emergency.  Initially, it was not clear how this extended deadline for electing COBRA was intended to interact with ARPA.  The Notice clarifies that the extension of timeframes under the Disaster Relief Notice do not apply to the ARPA timing requirements for providing notice or the extended election period.  Thus, if an Eligible Individual receives notice of an extended election period he or she can elect COBRA continuation coverage within 60 days of receiving the notice. The individual may elect COBRA coverage for only the period eligible for the COBRA Subsidy, or he or she may also elect retroactive coverage back to the date of the original loss of coverage.  The election of retroactive coverage would require the person to pay the COBRA premiums for periods of coverage before April 1, 2021. However, the extensions of the timeframes under the Disaster Relief Notice for paying those premiums would apply.  If the individual does not elect retroactive coverage at the same time that he or she elects subsidized COBRA coverage, he or she cannot later elect COBRA coverage under the extended period described in the Disaster Relief Notice.

Some other topics of interest set forth in the Notice include:

  • Coordination of the application of the COBRA Subsidy for employer provided retiree medical coverage.
  • Clarification that the COBRA Subsidy is available for coverage under vision-only plans, dental-only plans, and health reimbursement arrangements;
  • Clarification that any reduction in hours that results in a loss of coverage, regardless of whether voluntary or involuntary, can make someone an Eligible Individual.
  • Details on claiming the tax credit.

The above is only a brief summary of some of the more prominent aspects of the Notice.  There are still aspects of the COBRA Subsidy not addressed by the Notice.  Employers may wish to review the Notice in detail with benefits counsel to determine how the guidance impacts their COBRA administration.

Listen to this post

Join us for an educational trip around the globe without leaving the comfort of your home office. We know that the pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges for US multinational employers. In addition to keeping your employees safe and maintaining business continuity, it is difficult to keep track of the rapidly changing legal environment for employers both in the US and beyond. Since the legal and litigation landscape for employers is likely to continue to evolve as companies rebound and adjust to the new normal, it’s imperative to understand the major trends shaping the future of work in different areas of the world.

Our four-part webinar series is your passport to ensure that your organization is up to speed on the key labor and employment issues affecting business operations in Europe, The Americas, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East and Africa.

In each regional 60-minute webinar, our in-market presenters will discuss the most recent developments and challenges impacting employers and will share legal updates, practical tips and takeaways for companies to action now.

Join us at the sessions applicable to your organization.

EUROPE, Wednesday, June 2, 9am PT / 12pm ET

THE AMERICAS, Wednesday, June 9, 9am PT / 12pm ET

APAC, Wednesday, June 16, 3pm PT / 6pm ET

MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA, Wednesday, June 23, 9am PT / 12pm ET

Click here to view the invitation and to register.